Our preoccupation with death
March 29, 2005
By Dennis Prager- © 2005 Creators Syndicate, Inc.
There are good people on both sides of the Terri Schiavo tragedy, but chances
are that if you affirm Judeo-Christian values, you have opposed pulling the
feeding tube from the severely brain damaged woman's body.
Why? Because if there is anything that Judeo-Christian values stand for, it is
choosing life and rejecting death. As the Torah puts it, "I have put before you
today life and death, and you shall choose life."
Even believing Jews and Christians are not fully aware of how much the rejection
of death-oriented Egypt underlies the values and practices of the Torah, the
first five books of the Bible held sacred by Judaism and Christianity.
Egyptian civilization was steeped in death. Its bible was the Book of the Dead,
and its greatest monuments, its very symbols, the pyramids, were gigantic tombs.
One of the Torah's first tasks was to destroy the connection between
civilization (and, of course, religion) and death. That is the reason, I am
convinced, for the absence of overt mention of the afterlife in the Old
Testament – it was greatly concerned with getting humanity preoccupied with
life. With a few noble exceptions, preoccupation with the afterlife has led to
denigration of life. The Islamic terrorists and the cultures that support them
are only the most recent examples.
One of the greatest insights of Sigmund Freud, who, his atheism notwithstanding,
was perhaps the greatest mind of the 20th century, was that human beings have a
Death Instinct, a death wish that is as strong as the Life Instinct. He wrote
this decades before Nazism and the communist genocides of the 20th century
proved his point.
Yet, he was only saying in psychoanalytical terminology what Moses had said in
Deuteronomy thousands of years earlier.
The Torah began this transformation with its constant emphasis on rejecting
everything Egypt stood for. The ban on eating or even owning bread during the
seven days of Passover, the holiday commemorating the exodus from Egypt, the
central Old Testament event after Creation, was primarily a symbolic rejection
of Egypt.
As noted in the Encyclopedia Britannica, the Egyptians essentially invented
bread as we know it. "The Egyptians apparently discovered that allowing wheat
doughs to ferment, thus forming gases, produced a light, expanded loaf, and they
also developed baking ovens." (Fermented) bread symbolized Egypt as apple pie or
hot dogs might represent America. Moreover, fermentation is likened to sin and
death in both Jewish and Christian understandings of the Bible.
The Torah also banned Jewish priests from coming into contact with corpses. I
know of no other religious system that banned its holiest members from any
contact with the dead. This, too, was to separate life – the role of the priest
was to consecrate life – from death; and most of all, to separate Israelite
values from those of Egypt, where priests were regularly involved in religious
activities revolving around death.
The Torah's ban on sexual intercourse during menstruation is also a separation
of that which represents life (intercourse) from that which represents death
(menstruation). Biblically, menstruation had nothing to do with women being
"unclean." In fact, nearly the entire body of Torah instruction (found
especially in Leviticus, the least known of the five books) concerning what is
incorrectly translated as "unclean" or "impure" is actually about that which is
touched by death. Substitute "touched by death" for "impure" or "unclean," and
you will have a far better understanding of the text.
The somewhat better known ban on eating meat together with milk, emanating from
the law in the Torah – stated three times – that prohibits the boiling of a kid
in its mother's milk, is another example of separating life and death. Meat
(i.e., a dead mammal) represents death; and milk, the life-giving food of
mammals, represents life. (Jewish tradition only later added chicken, a
non-mammal, to the list of mammals not to be eaten with milk; and major Talmudic
rabbis did eat chicken with milk.)
The biblical and Judeo-Christian transformation of human thinking from death- to
life-orientation has been a staggering accomplishment – even though it has
obviously not been entirely successful even in the contemporary Western world.
The cavalier attitude about human life expressed among the leading opponents of
Judeo-Christian values – such as PETA, which equates barbecuing chickens with
cremating Jews; the Princeton ethicist who believes that parents can commit
infanticide under various conditions; those in the non Judeo-Christian West who
lack a moral problem with abortion for whatever reason; modern film and art that
portray death as kitsch; and the secular culture's contempt for those who call
themselves "pro-life" or believe that Terri Schiavo had a right to live – are
all examples of the contemporary attempt to undo the life wish of
Judeo-Christian values and affirm the natural death wish that resides in the
human soul.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dennis Prager, one of America's most respected and popular nationally syndicated
radio talk-show hosts, is the author of several books and a frequent guest on TV
shows such as "Larry King Live," "The O'Reilly Factor" and "Hannity & Colmes."