Why we support Bruce Balfour in his
ordeal?
By: Elias Bejjani
6/8/03
We learned that the support voiced by numerous Lebanese
Canadian NGOs to Mr. Bruce Balfour's arrest in occupied Lebanon was not fully comprehended
by some Canadian communities and politicians. Their question was, how could these Lebanese
Canadians step in to defend an individual who is accused of collaborating with Israel
against their homeland Lebanon?
While this reaction is in general genuine, stemming from good intentions and, most
importantly, is couched in Canadian criteria and norms, we believe with all due respect
that those who questioned our position are not knowledgeable enough in the intricacies of
the oppressive tactics used by Middle Eastern dictatorships. Many of us are here in
Canada because we lived and experienced firsthand these regimes' manipulative
political, judicial and falsely patriotic games. We can only cite, in reference, the
record of the regime of Saddam Hussein as it is being unearthed in the aftermath of the
Iraq War.
On behalf of the Eight Canadian Lebanese NGOs that went public in their staunch support of
Mr. Balfour, I would like to shed some light on certain painful realities that are imposed
on the peoples of the Middle East in general and on the Lebanese in particular:
1- After invading Lebanon in 1976, Syria completed its occupation of the country in 1990
by using military force to expel the country's legitimate government into exile, murdering
hundreds of Lebanese civilians, and installing a puppet subservient regime. The Syrian
Baath regime, no different from its clone in Iraq - then embarked on transforming Lebanon
from a vibrant, prosperous, and dynamically open society into a subdued, terrified, and
hungry one. It did this primarily by infiltrating its Intelligence Services - the
Mukhabaraat - into all of Lebanon's state and social institutions, spreading fear of
retribution among its opponents and rewarding its collaborators with government positions
and lucrative deals.
2- In particular, Lebanon's judiciary completely lost its independence and credibility and
became yet another tool of repression and revenge against those Lebanese who oppose the status
quo of the Syrian occupation. Lebanon's judiciary is today indeed politicized
and biased, and lacks impartiality on account of it having being Syrianized and, by proxy,
Iranized as well. Meanwhile hundreds of innocent Lebanese citizens remain detained
arbitrarily in Syria's notorious jails deprived of their most basic rights. Most of them
were handed over to the Syrian authorities by the Lebanese puppet regime itself - some are
even feared to serve as experimental guinea pigs in Syria's chemical weapons testing camps
- while thousands of Lebanese who oppose the Syrian occupation of their country are
imprisoned in occupied Lebanon and intimidated through false charges like the one laid
against Mr. Balfour.
3- The charge of "collaborating with the enemy" is a standard false charge that
dictatorships use against dissidents and opponents when they have no other legal grounds
to prosecute them. In the Arab world, this charge is often more specific as
"collaborating with Israel" or "collaborating with the Zionist
entity", etc. The judiciary bodies in these countries, especially in Syria and
occupied Lebanon, use these accusations ad libitum. To be accused of
"collaborating the Israel" is a death sentence, even though the rulers
themselves sporadically engage Israel in negotiations, overt or covert as the case may be.
Merely speaking with or otherwise engaging Jewish Canadian members of parliament is
frequently used to levy accusations of "dealing with the enemy" on the grounds
that any member of the Jewish faith is Israeli by extension. Thousands of otherwise
innocent citizens, politicians, dignitaries, journalists, clergy and academics in many
Arab countries are detained, jailed and executed under this charge.
How can anyone believe with any seriousness that such a charge could be levied by the
Lebanese regime against a non-Lebanese national, Mr. Balfour in this case, who most
innocently may have traveled to other countries? Are we to conclude that any Canadian,
including Canadian members of government or MPs, who visited Israel in the past are de
facto persona non grata in Lebanon because they have "collaborated with the
enemy"?
4- Rulers of these dictatorships in the Middle East are in power against the will of their
people. They honor no democratic principle, respect no human right, and do not represent
their own people. They only represent themselves and those foreign countries who appoint
them to serve their own interests. Both the Syrian Baath regime and its puppet regime in
Lebanon are two textbook examples of the worst such regimes. The parallels are uncanny
between these two regimes on one hand, and the German Nazis and their puppet Vichy regime
in occupied France during WWII on the other.
5- In this context, we, the Lebanese Canadian NGOs, will continue to defend Mr. Balfour in
his ordeal, convinced that the charge laid against him by the Lebanese authorities of
"collaboration with Israel against Lebanon", is not credible, has no basis in
fact, is drummed up, patently false, and a mere fabrication. We believe that Mr.
Balfour's arrest is a payback to Canada for having banned the terrorist organization
Hizbollah last year, and a message of retaliation from both Syria and Iran in regards to
the unresolved cases of the two Canadian citizens, Maher Arar (imprisoned in Syria) and
Ms. Zahra Kazemi (murdered in Iran). Mr. Balfour's case is no more than an
arm-twisting Syrian-Iranian tactic against bold anti-terrorism Canadian foreign policy.
6- We all regretfully recall the humiliating and threatening comments made last year by
Beirut's ambassador to Canada after it slammed a ban on the terrorist group Hizbollah that
the Lebanese and Syrian regimes sponsor and support. Although his comments were a frontal
attack on Canada's democracy and civil peace, as well as against the Lebanese-Canadian
community, the ambassador was never expelled and his case was handled very leniently. The
problem with dictatorships and terror-sponsoring regimes is that they are encouraged by
the appearance of weakness. Any leniency on the part of the Canadian government will
unfortunately be viewed by the Syrian and Lebanese regimes as a propensity to buckle under
the threat of blackmail and scare tactics, and on the long run, will invite more threats
and attacks.
In conclusion, we urge the Canadian government to adopt a more aggressive and principled
policy towards the Syrian-appointed Lebanese regime in regards to the violations it is
committing against the Canadian citizen Mr. Bruce Balfour. Dictatorships respond only to
serious and uncompromising firmness. The Canadian government must use all available
means and resources to secure the immediate and unconditional release of Mr. Bruce
Balfour, now in his fourth week of illegal detention, and to start dealing with the
Syrian-appointed Lebanese regime for what it is, a mere collaborator puppet that does not
represent the decent people of Lebanon, but rather the interests of its puppeteer in
Damascus, the Baath regime of Bashar Assad.
The Lebanese Canadian community embraces people like Mr. Balfour whose purpose in going to
Lebanon was a gesture that is dear to all Lebanese, namely to help that country restore
its national symbol, the famed Biblical Cedars of Lebanon. To do otherwise would be
against the traditions of diversity, universality, and eastern hospitality of which we and
the Lebanese people will always be proud.
Elias Bejjani
Human Rights activist, journalist & political commentator.
Spokesman for the Canadian Lebanese Human Rights Federation & Media Chairman for the
Canadian Lebanese Coordinating Council. phoenicia@hotmail.com