Text of Vatican statement on Pope speech
By The Associated Press
Sat Sep 16, 10:28 AM ET
Text of Vatican Secretary of State Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone's statement, issued
Saturday in Italian, about criticism in the Muslim world over Pope Benedict
XVI's remarks about Islam and violence. English translation is provided by the
Vatican:
Given the reaction in Muslim quarters to certain passages of the Holy Father's
address at the University of Regensburg, and the clarifications and explanations
already presented through the Director of the Holy See Press Office, I would
like to add the following:
The position of the Pope concerning Islam is unequivocally that expressed by the
conciliar document Nostra Aetate: "The Church regards with esteem also the
Muslims. They adore the one God, living and subsisting in Himself; merciful and
all-powerful, the Creator of heaven and earth, Who has spoken to men; they take
pains to submit wholeheartedly to even His inscrutable decrees, just as Abraham,
with whom the faith of Islam takes pleasure in linking itself, submitted to God.
Though they do not acknowledge Jesus as God, they revere Him as a prophet. They
also honor Mary, His virgin Mother; at times they even call on her with
devotion. In addition, they await the day of judgment when God will render their
deserts to all those who have been raised up from the dead. Finally, they value
the moral life and worship God especially through prayer, almsgiving and
fasting" (no. 3).
The Pope's option in favor of interreligious and intercultural dialogue is
equally unequivocal. In his meeting with representatives of Muslim communities
in Cologne, Germany, on 20 August 2005, he said that such dialogue between
Christians and Muslims "cannot be reduced to an optional extra," adding: "The
lessons of the past must help us to avoid repeating the same mistakes. We must
seek paths of reconciliation and learn to live with respect for each other's
identity."
As for the opinion of the Byzantine emperor Manuel II Paleologus, which he
quoted during his Regensburg talk, the Holy Father did not mean, nor does he
mean, to make that opinion his own in any way. He simply used it as a means to
undertake — in an academic context, and as is evident from a complete and
attentive reading of the text — certain reflections on the theme of the
relationship between religion and violence in general, and to conclude with a
clear and radical rejection of the religious motivation for violence, from
whatever side it may come. On this point, it is worth recalling what Benedict
XVI himself recently affirmed in his commemorative Message for the 20th
anniversary of the Inter-religious Meeting of Prayer for Peace, initiated by his
predecessor John Paul II at Assisi in October 1986: " ... demonstrations of
violence cannot be attributed to religion as such but to the cultural
limitations with which it is lived and develops in time. ... In fact,
attestations of the close bond that exists between the relationship with God and
the ethics of love are recorded in all great religious traditions."
The Holy Father thus sincerely regrets that certain passages of his address
could have sounded offensive to the sensitivities of the Muslim faithful, and
should have been interpreted in a manner that in no way corresponds to his
intentions. Indeed it was he who, before the religious fervor of Muslim
believers, warned secularized Western culture to guard against "the contempt for
God and the cynicism that considers mockery of the sacred to be an exercise of
freedom."
In reiterating his respect and esteem for those who profess Islam, he hopes they
will be helped to understand the correct meaning of his words so that, quickly
surmounting this present uneasy moment, witness to the "Creator of heaven and
earth, Who has spoken to men" may be reinforced, and collaboration may intensify
"to promote together for the benefit of all mankind social justice and moral
welfare, as well as peace and freedom" (Nostra Aetate no. 3).